I have kind memories of the old days in dentistry. There was no HIV-AIDS. Gloves were optional, and masks were mostly unthought of. My father owned one periodontal probe he had received in dental school, and the sum total of knowledge about gum problems was neatly compacted into a one eighth inch thick pamphlet. I'm talking about the dentists' knowledge, not just a patient brochure.
When I graduated from the University of Detroit Dental School in 1983, that small pamphlet of facts on gum disease became three hard covered books an inch and a half thick on the principles of periodontal diseases. We certainly had more to know, but the treatments for periodontal disease were essentially the same. Unfortunately, until about 5 years ago, the only difference in treatment procedures for gum disease was that dentists and hygienists were greater proponents. There was greater emphasis on the diseases, but most treatments remained the same.
Enter 2009 - with the advent of DNA testing and bacterial testing for periodontal bacteria, we have turned a new page in the treatment and responsibility for treatment of periodontal diseases. When our patients reported for their dental cleanings in the past, we may have noticed that they had swollen gums or bleeding when we probed their gums. Our general solution was to scold them that they had to floss more and see us more regularly. Most people were agreeable, as they weren't really flossing like they should have. Six months later, they would return with the same problem.
Really bad cases got sent to the gum surgeon. The usual procedure there was to cut away some of the swollen gum tissue, put the patient on more frequent maintenance appointments, and to scold them that they had to floss more. Every five to ten years the surgery might be repeated as long as they still had some teeth left.
Newsflash: I've tested several hundreds of these so called non-flossers over the past year for the possibility that they might be actually infected by a known badly pathogenic bacteria. Results of these tests have confirmed harmful bacteria present in all but one case. Eyeopener #2: I've tested about 21 couples or family groups in the past 3 months, and have found that each group shares an almost identical amount and type of harmful bacteria in their mouths.
No longer are we able to treat our patients with periodontal disease as individuals. There is such a strong correlation between close individuals and their periodontal bacteria, that we now need to look past just the individual.
With Knowledge comes responsibility! When I see Mr. Jones' bleeding, swollen gums, I have to take into account the health of Mrs. Jones. The children of parents with gum diseases need to be watched more closely. As dentists and hygienists, we can no longer deny the health of other family members in making treatment decisions.
Except for the introduction of technology like lasers and ultrasonic scalers, many of our periodontal treatments remain the same. However, the emphasis on who we treat has moved past the individual in the dental chair at the time. We all know to change our toothbrush after we get over a cold or the flu. It's not as easy to change a spouse, partner, or child just because they are infected with one or more of the harmful periodontal bacteria.
Will dentistry move toward the model of "group therapy?" I propose that this may be what we find in our future. More on this as it develops.
Jean was in today for her final "glamour shots" after her lip repositioning surgery. In both photos, she is forcing a large smile. The "after" photo shows a beautiful result, and she's most pleased with it.
